![]()
LINKS:
| People Rights Organization of America | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() We believe that rights in America should not be selective. There is at least one subset of Americans who have much less access to civil rights than the rest of us... the American soldier. Our purpose is to call attention to soldiers and others who need help to exercise those rights. In one case, a daughter was forced to fight in the Iraq war even though she had re-developed severe scoliosis that had been corrected when she was a child, and was pronounced "undeployable" by two Army doctors before deployment. In another, a fiancé was forced back into service after eight years of being out of the reserves. He was sent to Iraq even though he has high blood pressure. In yet another case, a veteran of 25 years was sent to Iraq too soon after a hysterectomy. After a few weeks, she had to be flown out on an emergency basis, and ended up in Walter Reed hospital. Now she has more physical problems since she was not initally allowed to heal properly. It has come to our attention that these cases are by no means isolated. Many commanders are pressured to put "boots on the ground", it does not matter very much what condition the soldier in those boots are in. Several soldiers and their family members have contacted us. The number is growing, but very few wish to speak publicly because of fear of retaliation. CAN YOU BLAME THEM? It is up to us to call attention to this problem, and to speak for them here. Many American citizens are very happy to sweep this problem under the rug. Some are verbally abusive over it. We will not deal with them on this site. Our purpose is not to fight with them, our purpose is to call attention to the plight of our soldiers and many others.
The ARMY IS ORDERING INJURED TROOPS TO GO TO IRAQ At Fort Benning, soldiers who were classified as medically unfit to fight are now being sent to war. Is this an isolated incident or a trend? By Mark Benjamin ![]() Photo: Reuters/Jason Reed George W. Bush greets troops and their families on the Tarmac before his departure from Fort Benning, Ga., on Jan. 11, 2007.
March 11, 2007 | COLUMBUS, Ga. -- "This is not right," said Master Sgt. Ronald Jenkins, who has been ordered to Iraq even though he has a spine problem that doctors say would be damaged further by heavy Army protective gear. "This whole thing is about taking care of soldiers," he said angrily. "If you are fit to fight you are fit to fight. If you are not fit to fight, then you are not fit to fight." ![]() Soldier's recent suicide may not have been isolated incident
SPC Peyton's family requests prayer and support To Friends and Family: I urgently need your prayers and support. For those of you that don't know, Matt was injured last November during hand-to-hand combat training while he was preparing for his second deployment to Iraq. He had surgery in January. He is currently on profile (which means he has a lot of restrictions) and has the status of "nondeployable". We have heard that Ft. Stewart was processing injured soldiers to be sent back to Iraq. We never dreamed that Matt would be one of them. To make a very long story short, they sent him last week to a Lt. Col. that changed his profile from "nondeployable" to "deployable". (This Lt. Col. is the one that is changing the profiles.) He lifted all restrictions. Handed him his new profile and told him that he would be sent to Iraq this Sunday. The next day, Matt went back to his Surgeon's office and saw one of the surgeons. The surgeon examined him, gave him a cortizone shot and issued him a new profile. The new and current profile states: He can NOT carry a weapon ... he can NOT move with a fighting load at least 2 miles (includes helmet, boots, uniform, weapon, protective gear, etc.) ... he can NOT construct an individual fighting position ... he can NOT do 3-5 second rushes under direct and indirect fire ... he is NOT healthy enough to be deployed. Said additional surgery was needed. Was put on non-deployable status. As soon as he handed this new profile to his Sergeant, he was told to report to his Captain. The Captain told him that he was NOT to pull his most current profile out of his pocket ... he was NOT to show his profile to anyone ... he was NOT to use this new profile in any way. He was told that this new profile would be deleted from the system and that he was going to be using the profile from the Lt. Col. that said he was OK to be deployed. Matt has tried to climb the different ranks, but time has run out and he is starting the process of being deployed. I don't understand how a soldier can have three current profiles that state that he can't do anything, then one Lt. Col. changes everything on the profile and says that he can do everything. Before you go to Iraq, you are suppose to have IRT Training. He has reported every day for his training, but he got sent home because he can't do the physical stuff that is required because of his injury. Now, he can't participate in the training - but he's being sent to Iraq. Makes no sense to me. To send Matt over now, when he has two surgeons that said he can't be deployed because he can't protect himself is killing me. My heart is breaking. But, I want you all to know something. I am blessed, because when all of this was unfolding, someone saw what was happening and before they had a chance to delete the current profile, this soldier made a copy and faxed it to me. YUP - Momma's got a copy and Momma's gonna start kickin' butt! I've already started the phone calls, faxing information to our Senator, Congressman, etc.; so I'm asking that you not call us on our home phone for a few days. But, I do have someone that is going to be monitoring our e-mails, so you can contact us via the internet. I'm asking anyone that is reading this e-mail, to please contact anyone that you think could make a difference. If any of you would like to call Ft. Stewart and tell them a thing or two, well ... here is their number. It's (punch in "0" to get the operator). Please, I'm begging you, we need your help! Thanks. Beverly Kay (Bo-Kay) Peyton SPC James Webb Iraq Veteran Needs Your Help Reply to: giwifegimom@netscape.net Date:, 7:21PM EDT ![]() James and Michelle On their Wedding Day
James Webb is an Iraq war veteran who is in need of help. My first visit with him was Saturday May 21st. SPC Patrick G. Barron My name is Kimberly A. Barron and my husband is SPC Patrick G. Barron. Patrick has a T-3 profile for his knees, and has been on one since being mobilized August 17, 2004. The name of his condition is Chrondromalacia Pattelar, which is a DEGENERATIVE condition involving the cartilage beneath the knee caps. He has been diagnosed by several doctors including both army and civilian doctors here at home. I have all medical documents from the army, including copies of ALL his profiles. In the 11th hour before his deployment ceremony, a doctor came in and—without benefit of MRI and X-Rays—wiped out all previous diagnosis and diagnosed my husband with ITB (runner’s knee), which is correctable. I believe that this is the diagnosis that sent my husband to Iraq. Upon arrival in Kuwait, my husband was seen by the Chief surgeon there who reinstated the initial diagnosis of CP. He asked my husband, “How the hell did you get this far? You shouldn’t have gotten through SRC!” He then stated two things that disturbed me: 1) If he had it his way my husband would receive a P-3 and be MEB boarded. He will be eventually, just not NOW. 2) He would get Pat through this deployment with steroid shots, but, but he could not guarantee that it would not leave him crippled. This is very true as I have done research on it. My husband is in the Army National Guard, and I feel that he is being retained for the “numbers”. We are in Texas, and up to this point I have contacted senators, his chain of command, and congress people, both by email and snail mail across the nation. The response has been more run-arounds and dancing around the topics. There are so many variables in this case including an accident my husband had and in which army procedure was not followed. Medical treatment was NOT administered and it could have been serious, but now we won’t know. I have copies of all medical records and correspondence with everyone I have contacted. Thank You So Much, God Bless You, Kimberly A. Barron THE SOLDIER
~~~ Author UnknownThe soldier stood and faced God, Which must always come to pass. He hoped his shoes were shining, Just as brightly as his brass. "Step forward now, you soldier, How shall I deal with you? Have you always turned the other cheek? To My Church have you been true?" The soldier squared his shoulders and said, "No, Lord, I guess I ain't. Because those of us who carry guns, Can't always be a saint. I've had to work most Sundays, And at times my talk was tough. And sometimes I've been violent, Because the world is awfully rough. But, I never took a penny, That wasn't mine to keep... Though I worked a lot of overtime, When the bills got just too steep. And I never passed a cry for help, Though at times I shook with fear. And sometimes, God, forgive me, I've wept unmanly tears. I know I don't deserve a place, Among the people here. They never wanted me around, Except to calm their fear. If you've a place for me here, Lord, It needn't be so grand. I never expected or had too much, But if you don't, I'll understand." There was a silence all around the throne, Where the saints had often trod. As the soldier waited quietly, For the judgment of his God. "Step forward now, you soldier, You've borne your burdens well. Walk peacefully on Heaven's streets, You've done your time in Hell." “This Is How They Treat Their Veterans” David Beals Prepares To Return To Iraq Haunted By Post Traumatic Stress Disorder And A Suicide Attempt From: Dawnmarie Beals To: GI Special Sent: March 26, 2005 Subject: This is a story put out in the paper about my husband. This is how they treat their Veterans. 3.12.05 Savannah Morning News David Beals, a 3rd Infantry Division soldier, is scheduled to leave Tuesday to return to Iraq. His wife, Dawnmarie, says he's not ready, mentally, to go yet. Soldier David Beals thought the night visions of his wartime experiences from Iraq were exorcised for good. At first, he tried to wash them away with alcohol. That didn't work. What did was the cleansing love of the woman who would become his wife, and her two small children, who he adopted as his own. But as Beals' 3rd Infantry Division unit trained to redeploy - as his leaders started describing the deadly dangers awaiting them again in Iraq - the nightmares returned. David Beals returned to the bottle. And a bottle of Percocet his wife, Dawnmarie, had been prescribed after surgery. Now, a month and a half after that suicide attempt, Beals is about to rejoin his unit in Iraq. He's scheduled to leave Tuesday. Both husband and wife are worried he's not quite well enough yet. David is now more hopeful. "I don't feel like I did ... before," the soldier said. "But I have my days. I have my moments." Dawnmarie, however, isn't as confident. "My husband is not ready. I'm OK with him deploying. He's been there before. But not like this. He needs help. I just don't want him to go until he gets that help." His superiors should realize this, she said. "They told him that he has to be mentally prepared to go over there." Dawnmarie doesn't think he is. David Beals started attending counseling after the suicide attempt. He was told, he said, that he has post traumatic stress disorder and would need at least five weeks of therapy. After talking to his unit commanders, Beals' counselor said the soldier could get two weeks of therapy here and the remaining counseling for PTSD in the war zone, Beals said. He has little choice but to comply. After the suicide attempt, the soldier went absent without leave. When he returned, he even thought about applying for conscientious objector status, like Sgt. Kevin Benderman, a member of the same unit. In the end, though, David Beals made a deal to stay in the Army and return to the war. The specialist had made sergeant, but the promotion is being held up, according to the couple and Army legal documents. The Brass looks at his status as if he were on probation. Foul up and he could end up in the stockade. Husband and wife are worried. They have been since that January night Dawnmarie found David on the bathroom floor. She wasn't really surprised. The soldier had been out of sorts for weeks, if not months. Nightmares. The redeployment. The vague sense that something inside was dreadfully wrong. Without giving much thought to what he was doing, he said, he emptied the 30 pills into his mouth. "I just wanted it to end," he said. It very nearly did. With the help of a friend, Dawnmarie got her husband to the hospital, where they pumped his stomach. That night - and for several nights afterward - the concern was that he would try it again. He was put on suicide watch even though, he says, his superiors told him they thought the attempt was a fake, a means to get out of deployment. The Army escort sent to accompany the soldier from the hospital was on crutches. It was easy, Beals said later, to literally run away once they got out of the hospital. He was absent without leave for about two weeks. But he returned on his own to face possible charges of desertion. Confined, he considered a request for conscientious objector status. "But I don't believe I fit that description," he said. "You have to be against all wars. I'm not." The Army worked out a deal for him to rejoin his unit. In the meantime, he gets sergeant's pay but not the stripes. His promotion is being held up illegally, Beals' military lawyer has argued. Both Beals say, suicide attempt aside, he is being singled out because they have publicly questioned his unit's leadership's ability to command. They say that's the reason, too, that he's not getting the kind of counseling he needs before returning to Iraq. Dawnmarie has even taken matters up with Maj. Gen. William G. Webster, the division commander who's now in Iraq, and Cmd. Sgt. Maj. William Grant. "I'm just afraid my soldier will go over there and he won't return," she said. Of course, she acknowledges all spouses feel that way. She's an assistant leader for one of the division's family readiness groups - a network of spouses and families from a unit that help one another get through deployments and other rough times. But how many of those spouses, she asks, would feel fine with their soldiers heading off to war, rifle in hand, life on the line, just weeks after a suicide attempt. "I don't care what I have to do," she said. "I just want to protect my husband." FOLLOW UP Soldier Who Attempted Suicide Leaves For Iraq Local News Web posted March 21, 2005 Savannah Morning News David Beals, the 3rd Infantry Division soldier who acknowledged that he attempted suicide, then went absent without leave just before he was scheduled to redeploy to Iraq, flew out of Hunter Army Airfield Saturday evening to rejoin the division in the war-torn country, said his wife, Dawnmarie. Beals was scheduled to leave March 15, but the deployment was delayed, she said. The Army gave no reason for the postponement, she added. While the Army considers Beals to be a specialist, documents show that he has earned the rank of sergeant, a promotion the service says is being held up because of the circumstances surrounding the soldier's missed deployment earlier this year. Beals' military lawyer has been contesting that ruling. Beals was told by military counselors he has post-traumatic stress disorder. His wife said he is supposed to be receiving counseling in Iraq. [Don’t hold your breath.] The Sunday Times - Britain June 12, 2005 Ministers were told of need for Gulf war ‘excuse’ Michael Smith MINISTERS were warned in July 2002 that Britain was committed to taking part in an American-led invasion of Iraq and they had no choice but to find a way of making it legal. The warning, in a leaked Cabinet Office briefing paper, said Tony Blair had already agreed to back military action to get rid of Saddam Hussein at a summit at the Texas ranch of President George W Bush three months earlier. The briefing paper, for participants at a meeting of Blair’s inner circle on July 23, 2002, said that since regime change was illegal it was “necessary to create the conditions” which would make it legal. This was required because, even if ministers decided Britain should not take part in an invasion, the American military would be using British bases. This would automatically make Britain complicit in any illegal US action. “US plans assume, as a minimum, the use of British bases in Cyprus and Diego Garcia,” the briefing paper warned. This meant that issues of legality “would arise virtually whatever option ministers choose with regard to UK participation”. The paper was circulated to those present at the meeting, among whom were Blair, Geoff Hoon, then defence secretary, Jack Straw, the foreign secretary, and Sir Richard Dearlove, then chief of MI6. The full minutes of the meeting were published last month in The Sunday Times. The document said the only way the allies could justify military action was to place Saddam Hussein in a position where he ignored or rejected a United Nations ultimatum ordering him to co-operate with the weapons inspectors. But it warned this would be difficult. “It is just possible that an ultimatum could be cast in terms which Saddam would reject,” the document says. But if he accepted it and did not attack the allies, they would be “most unlikely” to obtain the legal justification they needed. The suggestions that the allies use the UN to justify war contradicts claims by Blair and Bush, repeated during their Washington summit last week, that they turned to the UN in order to avoid having to go to war. The attack on Iraq finally began in March 2003. The briefing paper is certain to add to the pressure, particularly on the American president, because of the damaging revelation that Bush and Blair agreed on regime change in April 2002 and then looked for a way to justify it. There has been a growing storm of protest in America, created by last month’s publication of the minutes in The Sunday Times. A host of citizens, including many internet bloggers, have demanded to know why the Downing Street memo (often shortened to “the DSM” on websites) has been largely ignored by the US mainstream media. The White House has declined to respond to a letter from 89 Democratic congressmen asking if it was true — as Dearlove told the July meeting — that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy” in Washington. The Downing Street memo burst into the mainstream American media only last week after it was raised at a joint Bush-Blair press conference, forcing the prime minister to insist that “the facts were not fixed in any shape or form at all”. John Conyers, the Democratic congressman who drafted the letter to Bush, has now written to Dearlove asking him to say whether or not it was accurate that he believed the intelligence was being “fixed” around the policy. He also asked the former MI6 chief precisely when Bush and Blair had agreed to invade Iraq and whether it is true they agreed to “manufacture” the UN ultimatum in order to justify the war. He and other Democratic congressmen plan to hold their own inquiry this Thursday with witnesses including Joe Wilson, the American former ambassador who went to Niger to investigate claims that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium ore for its nuclear weapons programme. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1650822,00.html (you must paste this link to your browser) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you wish to submit your story to this site, please feel free to do so. You do not have to be a soldier or in a minority, however, soldiers are our main focus at this time. If you feel that your rights have been trampled, you can contact us below. Your name will not be used if you request. Please note, any email that uses profane or vulgar language will be ignored! SGT TONY LAMPIN ![]() My husband has gone through two surgeries on his knee, gone through physical therapy, water therapy, and has taken numerous medications all to no prevail. The current medications he is on right now are Celebrex, Ultracet, and Percocet. Just a little information on the meds: Celebrex, is for his arthritis, and one of the warning labels on it is “avoid prolonged or excessive exposure to direct sunlight”. I ask you this, what does Iraq have plenty of? Ultracet, and Percocet are taken for pain, and both have a warning label that says: may cause drowsiness/dizziness, and SHOULD NOT operate machinery. He has not gotten any better after the second surgery, and in fact, it is starting to get worse once again. His doctor even told him that his knee is permanently damaged, and that being sent back to Iraq would only make it worse. In my husband’s medical records, the last entry that was entered by his doctor reads this: At this point we will begin a permanent profile. I'd like to switch him over to Arthrotec to see if that treats his osteoarthritic symptoms better. I'd additionally like him to consider having a steroid injection at the lateral portal site if he is not better in another three to six weeks at the lateral portal site. If he continues to persist and we are unable to find a non- steroidal that can control his osterarthritic symptoms, I would consider offering a Viscus supplementation, Hyalgan injections. He is reticent to have that many injections in his knee and I can understand that but his may help him significantly with his pain. We discussed that at today's visit. Permanent profile was written today recommending him for a medical board as he has attempted to take a walk and bicycle PT test and had been unable to pass either of them and this has now been two years from his initial injury to the knee that he's not a record PT test. This was entered on June 9, 2004 by doctor Shawn P. Granger, MAJ. U.S. Army, Bayne Jones ACH Fort Polk, La. Now here is where the being forced back to Iraq comes in. After showing this profile to his Battalion Commander, Colonel Richards, he stated that he would override the medical board, and force him to go back to Iraq for a second time with the company. The Colonel promised that he would take care of him and the other soldier and see that nothing will happen to them. Here is the thing, how can the Colonel do this if he himself is not going to Iraq. That he has been reassigned to another duty station sitting behind a nice desk, safe and sound in a hospital in Milwaukee. He said that my husband and the other soldier were badly needed and that there was nothing they could do. I ask this, if, God forbid, something was to happen to them, what would the company do, pack up and go home? Get this, before he was relieved by a Colonel Short, Colonel Richards changed his mind and decided to not take my husband and the other soldier and have their deployable status changed back to non deployable status. After doing this, the new Colonel said that why bother because he would just change it back and still force them to go. That he wants to hear from their doctor himself saying that they would only get worse if deployed to Iraq. My husband's doctor had been saying this for over a month. If he was told this, he would not take them. This is where Colonel Short lied to his soldiers. They were forced to go anyway. He also, like Colonel Richards, promises to keep them safe. What is he going to do, keep them by his side at all times? How can he do this if my husband will be on a convoy from Kuwait to Abu Ghraib Prison where they are being sent to set up a hospital for the prisoners/soldiers? A convoy is one of the most dangerous places to be for a soldier, and the prison alone isn't really all that safe. It has been attacked 6 times in the past 3 months. Which includes a mortar attack that hit the quarters that my husband's company was to be placed in. There also, they have to wear their protective gear at all times. Which means my husband will be forced to go against his medical profile of not to carry or lift anything over 30lbs. During all this, we then began to write our State Senator of Texas, Mrs. Kay Hutchison. We sent all the information that was needed for an investigation into why was my husband not allowed his medical board and forced to go to war. All this was done last month, but yesterday, Aug. 3, I was informed that my husbands’ Congressional has come back, and was read to me by phone. It basically said that my husband's commander, Colonel Richards, has the say if my husband can be deployed or not. I find it unacceptable. No one should be able to tell a soldier that he can no longer receive treatment and not be able to be medical boarded out of service and then force him to go to war where his life would be at greater risk. The stories of older soldiers in their 50's and 60's, I hear, are being told to America that they have been called back for duty. Some of these soldiers died in Iraq due to heart failure, heat stroke, and various other medical conditions. If I am not mistaken, did or did not the Army ordered retired personal without medical problems back for duty; hence the word “without”. Why doesn't this apply to soldiers who are active? How do you think Americans would react to medically unfit soldiers being sent back to war? How would they react to the fact that they are unable to fend for/ protect themselves and others properly? Do they know that many of our soldiers are on medications that make them sleepy or dizzy? How do you think they would feel if they knew that their tax dollars are being used to send unfit soldiers to war? When I took my husband to Fort Polk for departure on July 25th, I noticed that a female soldier, whose name I do not know, was on crutches. What was wrong with her? She had a broken foot. Was she going? Yes. I have a question for you, how is she going to protect herself if an attack was to occur? Was she to shoot the enemy with her crutches? The last I heard from my husband was this past Saturday. I asked how things were going so far, and he said not great. The soldier that has a broken foot was forced to walk on it without her crutches. Now, I know that depending on the fracture, you can apply force, but this soldier is in a war. She can't just rush into things. As for him, he told me that his knee was giving him problems and is really hurting him. He had to take himself off a shooting range in Kuwait because the drugs mixed with the heat were causing him to almost pass out. What will it be like for him in the convoy? I am afraid to think. The convoy is supposed to take 3 to 4 days because of the heat, and they are only allowed to drive for so long. During that time, will my husband be able to stay alert? I can only pray. My husband has served in the Army for 12 long years. He has been to the Gulf War, where he initially hurt his knee during training. He went to Kuwait last year for Operation Iraqi Freedom, and after being forced he’s there again despite being medically unfit for duty. I don't know how long he was there for the Gulf War. He was in Kuwait last year for only 3 months, and during this next tour, they told him to be prepared to be there between 6 months to a year. Can you just imagine what further damage his knee will be in? I will leave this letter at this. The 115th Field Hospital's motto is “Warrior Medic” and they are here to take care of patients. My husband is a patient. How are they taking care of him? By not letting him get the medical attention he needs and sending him back to war? My husband has served proudly for his country, but look how he is getting treated. He deserves better than that. Our country owes him its gratitude. America let my husband, the father of my children, your son, come home. Brandie Lampin, Wife of a medically unfit soldier Brandie is a member of Military Families Speak Out. SGT LAMPIN IS COMING HOME OUR DADA, SGT. TONY LAMPIN, A MEDICALLY UNFIT SOLDIER FORCED INTO IRAQ, IS COMING HOME From: Brandie Lampin, (USMC retd) To: GI Special Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:55 PM Subject: Sgt. Lampin is Coming Home As of Oct. 19th Tony called me to inform me that the command of the 115th Field Hospital has come to the decision to send my husband, Sgt. Tony Lampin, home. When he told me this, I broke down in tears of joy and got on my knees to thank God for his gift. I asked Tony if the reason for him to be sent home was because of what I have been doing and he said some of it, but some of it was because of the doctors making a written, and verbal statement that since there is nothing else they can do for him, that he should be sent home. My reply to that is this: In my heart, a great deal of it was because of my long fight for his return, but the command, and the U.S. Army will not admit to that, so I will more than happy to take 50% of the reason. I would just like to say thank you to the Senators and Congressmen/women who I have contacted and looked into my husbands case, to the supporters who called, emailed, and snail mailed me giving me their full support. Thank you to the Soldiers who posted their comments about my husband. To GI Special, thank you so much for posting my letters. You are part of the reason why Tony is being sent home. MOST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK GOD FOR HIS WONDERFUL GIFT TO MY CHILDREN AND I. WE ARE IN GREAT DEBT TO YOU LORD! Today, Oct. 27th Tony called me from Germany letting me know that he will be home soon but did not know exactly when. Look for another post by me with pictures of our reunion. It was a long battle, and like I said before; "Though the Command will never admit to it, I won the battle and it just proves that it can be done." Now that my mission to bring my husband home was accomplished, I would like to say that I am not going to stop in the aid to bring others like my husband home. I will continue helping with advise, writing letters, and making phones calls. If anyone should need my help, please email me or snail mail me. I will be more than happy to help in any way that I can. God Bless America, God Bless you all. Brandie Lampin, 165 Eubanks Rd. Leesville, La. 71446 FOR MORE ABOUT SGT. LAMPIN CHECK OUT TRAVELING SOLDIER Telling the truth - about the occupation, the cuts to veterans benefits, or the dangers of depleted uranium - is the first reason Traveling Soldier is necessary. But we want to do more than tell the truth; we want to report on the resistance - whether it's in the streets of Baghdad, New York, or inside the armed forces. Our goal is for Traveling Soldier to become the thread that ties working-class people inside the armed services together. We want this newsletter to be a weapon to help you organize resistance within the armed forces. If you like what you've read, we hope that you'll join with us in building a network of active duty organizers. http://www.traveling-soldier.org/ And join with Iraq War vets in the call to end the occupation and bring our troops home now! (www.ivaw.net) ![]() | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Personal Voices: Bring Back Our Husbands
![]()
![]()
|
Bring Back Our Husbands: ** My name is Barbara Facey. I married Howard Facey in 1997. I immediately filed an immigration petition for Howard, but didn't hear anything for six years. Last summer, a lawyer advised Howard to check on his paperwork at Federal Plaza. Immigration officers there told him to return the next Monday for work authorization. When he did, he was detained and shipped to Jamaica based on a 1995 deportation order from Alaska. Howard never saw a judge. Howard called home from JFK airport at 6 a.m. to say that he was being deported. My heart sank, but I did not have the time to break down. I had to get our three kids ready for school, and rush to work at a local drugstore. Letisha, Kristina, and Christopher ask for their dad everyday. Their grades are dropping, and the school counselor says they are depressed. Childcare is really hard. When a family friend who was supposed to get Christopher from school was late a few times, the principal threatened to call Children's Services. With all this pressure, I don't have the time to properly treat my heart condition. Life has turned upside down since our husbands were taken away. Our husbands are not a threat to anyone. They used to help with everything: pick up the kids from school; take them to the library, the park, McDonald's. It is so hard to raise kids as single mothers, but you have to push yourself for them. We're both terrified of people saying we are bad parents and taking our babies away. All our personal ambitions -- to get better jobs, make real careers -- are out the window while we just try to make it. Our husbands cannot help. In detention, you make one dollar a day for full-time work. Back home in the Caribbean, no one will hire a US deportee. When our families were first torn apart, we had no idea what was happening or where to turn for help. Now we know our rights, and protect ourselves from scam attorneys and deceitful immigration officers. We want other families to protect themselves the same way we are learning to, and speak out. Silence is killing us. Faith is helping us get through our situations. Even though our husbands have already been taken, we will not give up. And we refuse to let this happen to other families. We are dedicated to changing the laws that ruined our homes, to overcome the fear controlling every part of our lives. Right before September 11, Republicans and Democrats pledged support for a Fix '96 campaign that would repeal the laws that are tearing apart our families. It's time to revive this effort, and to stop punishing people solely for being immigrants. Our husbands may not be citizens, but they and we remain human beings. Barbara Facey and Carol McDonald are members of Families for Freedom, an immigrant defense network of people facing deportation. For more information, call 212-898-4121. ** ![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA_Peace and Justice Calender
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PEOPLE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION OF AMERICA Stone Mountain, GA |
![]() |
| 1487 Visitors |