*Legalese
*Interpreting in the news.
*Criminal Pre-Trial Hearings.
*Members Gallery
*Picture Gallery
*Archives
*Contract outline
*Holiday Party 2006
*HOME

News


UPDATE

The Interpreters' Chapter, Local 1070 has new Directors. They are;

Chair:

Lia Friedman,

Vice-Chair:

Umesh Passi,

Secretary:

Mariana Scardino.

You will find the links below a good resource for your linguistic questionsMeet your colleagues in other courts.

Go to the Members Gallery section.

Books

See a brief review on Volume 4 of the International journal of research and practice in interpreting.

November 2009
SMTWTFS
1234 567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930

Click Here for Full Calendar



Chair:
Lia Friedman
Vice-Chair:
Umesh Passi
Recording Secreary:
Mariana Scardino

Links Section

DC 37 LOCAL 1070

NAJIT

ATA

FCICE

NYS UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM

ALL BOOKS

DICCIONARIOS

REAL ACADEMIA ESPAñOLA

SPANISH MEDICAL ENCYCLOPEDIA

WORD REFERENCE. COM

300 PROVERBS; ENG/SPAN.

THEATER DEVELOPMENT FUND

TRANSLATORS AND INTERPRETERS GUILD.

COOK COUNTY (CHICAGO) INTERPRETERS' WEBPAGE.

img
Criminal Pre-Trial Hearings.
img
Click here to edit your pageClick here to go to your office

Alford Hearing: (Alford v North Carolina) – Plea of guilty with assertion of innocence.

Aponte Hearing:(People v Aponte)to determine competency of a criminally insane prisoner to initiate proceeding to obtain relief from conviction.

Brady Motion: Pre-trial demand for material or evidence possessed by prosecutor that is favorable to or exculpates defendant.

Clayton Hearing:(People v Clayton) – To dismiss indictment “In the interest of justice”.

Darden Hearing:(People v Darden) – An in camera hearing with judge and confidental informant,without disclosing his identity, to determine whether sufficient information was given by the informer to justify the search warrant that was issued.

Dunaway Hearing:(Dunaway v New York) – To determine if police had “probable cause” to detain and arrest defendant.

Einhorn Hearing:(People v Einhorn) – To determine if illegal eavesdropping evidence is the basis of a question asked a witness before a Grand Jury.

Gelbard Hearing:(U.S. v Gelbard) – Request to learn whether questions asked before a Federal Grand Jury are derived from electronic means of surveillance.

Huntley Hearing: (People v Huntley) – To determine voluntariness of confession.

Luck Hearing:(U.S. v Luck) – To determine if defendant’s prior conviction may be used for impeachment purposes.

Mapp Hearing: (Mapp v Ohio) – A hearing to determine whether evidence should be suppressed because it has been obtained in violation of the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.

Miranda Hearing: (Miranda v Arizona) – To determine whether defendant was properly advised of rights at the time of arrest.

Montgomery Hearing: (People v Montgomery) – To determine whether defendant received adequate notice of his right to appeal from judgement.

Sandoval Hearing: (People v Sandoval) - A hearing to determine which portions of a defendant’s prior record can be brought out by the prosecution a trial if defendant testifies. <{> Simmons Hearing: (Simmons v U.S.) – To determine the use of police photographs to establish identity. Townsend Hearing: (People v Townsend) – As to the delay between time of arrest and indictment “Speedy Trial Rule”

Wade Haring: (U.S. v Wade) – To determine the Propriety of pre-trial identification (line-up)

Witherspoon Hearing: (Witherspoon v Illinois) – Examination on the voir dire as to juror attitude to the death penalty.

Compiled by: Alfredo Gonzales, Bronx Supreme Court.


 
1088 Visitors  Legalese | Interpreting in the news. | Criminal Pre-Trial Hearings. | Members Gallery | Picture Gallery | Archives
Contract outline | Holiday Party 2006 | HOME | WRITE US

TOP