img src Eclipart
*Video Links



Videos are located on the Video Links page (above).


The late Environmental Board chair Dr. Mary Gay Maxwell is remembered.(watch on Video Links; see also Sham Report linked below.)

San Marcos Charter Amendment Banning Fluoridation


Fluoride Free Austin Twitter

Committee on Public Health & Human Services Briefi

Fluoride Action Network (FAN)

Citizens for Safe Drinking Water

Keepers of the Well

Fluoride Free Fairbanks

Fluoride Class Action (Website)


Parents of Fluoride Poisoned Children

Bibliography of Scientific Literature on Fluoride

City of Austin Sham Fluoridation Report of 11/2009

ADA "Fluoridation Facts" Propaganda Piece 2005

Fluoride Journal

Fluoride News Tracker (NYSCOF)

IAOMT (Dental Professionals Opposed to F and Hg)

Toxicity of Ingested Industrial Fluoride

The Winn Parker Radio Show 10 am-noon CST Sundays

All About Dental Fluorosis

Report of the National Research Council 2006

1954 U.S. House Hearings on Fluoridation

Surgeon General's 2000 Report on Oral Health

Surgeon General's 2000 Report on Oral Health PR

2009 JADA Article: Tooth Decay on Rise Among Poor

Fluoride, Phosphates and Radioactivity

Thyroid Experts Speak Out Against Fluoride

Cosmetic Dentist Speaks Out Against Fluoride

Organized Dentistry Threatens City Councilmembers

Nebraskans Reject Fluoridation En Masse

Juneau - fluoride Study Commission's Report
Click here to edit your pageClick here to go to your office
capitolbright2.jpgWelcome to the Fluoride Free Austin Reading Room          

This page is intended as a clearinghouse for accurate, up to date information about water fluoridation. It combines original content, including local news, with dozens of links. Think of the links as books in a library, ranging from massive tomes to news stories to scientific papers, to information-packed websites. Curl up with the National Research Council's 2006 report, study ADA propaganda, read recent science, follow current political battles. We hope you'll spend some time exploring our reading room.

Water Fluoridation in the United States

The long, sordid story of water fluoridation begins in the 1940's, during WW II. Our factories were running 24 hours a day to produce the steel, aluminum and enriched uranium that would defeat the Nazi war machine. But a worrisome problem loomed. Fluorspar, a material crucial to smelting, was destroying the health of workers while creating fluoride-laden toxic waste in need of disposal. Meanwhile, in rural Colorado and Texas, a handful of dentists had made a discovery - or thought they had. They believed, incorrectly, that fluoride was good for teeth. The captains of industry took up their claim. The rest is history.

Today, about two thirds of our municipal water systems have been fluoridated, often against the residents' express wishes. (in Austin, it was implemented in 1973 following a lightly attended City Council-engineered pseudo-referendum approved by 57% of a poorly-informed voting public). Behind the crusade to fluoridate 100% of America's drinking water supply are the enormous financial and political resources of the American Dental Association, the Centers for Disease Control 56using everything in their toolbox: money, propaganda, pressure and threats, we may well ask ourselves why a group of health professionals should so relentlessly push a forced mass medication scheme which, if it truly worked, would put them out of business.

Indeed, there is much to wonder about concerning the fluoridation issue. The following Q & A will provide some answers.


What is fluoride?

A1: Fluoride is the name given to any compound of fluorine, an extremely toxic and reactive element that occurs in several forms, both natural and artificial.

Q2: Where does fluoride come from?

A2: The fluoride used for water fluoridation is a manmade industrial waste product called fluorisilicic acid. Most of it comes from the smokestack scrubbers of phosphate fertilizer plants in Florida; some from China. Natural fluoride occurs as calcium fluoride (fluorspar) in many parts of the world.

Q3: Why do we add fluoride to our drinking water?

A3: Ostensibly, as a tooth decay preventative for children, especially poor children. In reality, our public water supplies have been used as toxic waste disposal systems since 1945.

Q4: What are the benefits of drinking fluoridated water?

A4: There are none. Even the Centers for Disease Control has admitted that any fluoride benefits come from topical application (as in brushing), not ingestion. And both the Surgeon General and the Texas Dental Association report an "epidemic" of oral disease among the the same low income groups water fluoridation was supposed to help.

Q5: Are there health risks associated with drinking fluoridated water?

A5: Fluoride is one of the most reactive and toxic elements known to man (it lies between lead and arsenic in toxicity). By replacing necessary nutrients like calcium and iodine, it damages the body's many systems, including:
  • teeth
  • bones
  • thyroid
  • kidneys
  • brain
  • pineal gland
In 2006, the National Research Council's groundbreaking report, Fluoride in Drinking Water, based on the review of hundreds of peer-reviewed research papers, enumerated in detail fluoride's adverse affects on human and animal health.

Q6: How could the FDA approve such a toxic substance?

A6: Fluoride has never received FDA approval for human consumption. The FDA has approved fluoride for use in rat poison and other pesticides.

Q7: Are some people more at risk from drinking fluoridated water than others?

A7: Yes. Infants, children, members of low income and minority groups, diabetics, kidney patients, and people who consume more than average amounts of water like athletes and construction workers are all at especially high risk for fluoride-associated health problems.

Q8: Drinking fluoridated tapwater doesn't seem to bother me. How do I know it's hurting me?

A8: Fluoride is a cumulative toxin, building up in the body over years. Its effects vary widely - from bone cancer and osteoporosis to underactive thyroid - and when symptoms develop, their cause may not be recognized.

Q9: How much fluoride is in our tapwater?

A9: The US Public Health Service recommends 0.7 parts per million - 46 times the EPA's permissible limit for lead.

Q10: Do other countries fluoridate their water?

A10: Only the United States, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand widely fluoridate their drinking water. The rest of Europe, Israel and Japan either never adopted the practice or have abandoned it.

Q11: How does dental health in the United States stack up against that in non-fluoridated western countries?

A11: They are comparable.

Q12: My dentist swears by fluoride. Why would family dentists support a product that doesn't work and has serious side effects?

A12: Every dentist trained in the United States within the past 50 years has attended a school committed to promoting fluoride in all its forms. Many believe the claims. And individuals who openly disagree risk disciplinary action by the American Dental Association.

Q13: Why do our top health bureaucracies - (CDC, FDA, EPA, state health departments), professional organizations (ADA, AMA), universities, dental schools and research organizations cling so tenaciously to a long-discredited program?

A13: Fear of litigation - of the avalanche of ruinous lawsuits that would follow an admission of error - is the likely main reason, followed by fear of losing face. An unwillingness to part with long-held beliefs and sheer inertia contribute their share to the resistance as well.


In early 2011, after 40 years of defining the "optimal" level of fluoride in drinking water as between 0.7 and 1.25 parts per million depending on climate, the Centers for Disease Control abruptly redefined "optimal" as a flat 0.7 ppm with no climate-based range. Their odd change of course was based, not on any new scientific findings; not on their recognition of our fluoride-saturated modern-day environment or their belated discovery of widespread air conditioning (which would actually push the "optimal" level toward the higher end, 1.25 ppm based on the theory that people in hotter climates are drinking less water than previously); but upon the embarrassing fact - no longer possible to hide - that nearly half our youth suffered from dental fluorosis. And the numbers were growing.

The data showing 41% of U.S. youth aged 12-15 to be afflicted with dental fluorosis - with African Americans and Hispanics suffering disproportionately - was based on two National Health and Nutrition Examination surveys (NHANES) conducted by the CDC from 1999-2002 and first published in 2005 when it was already several years outdated. According to Michael Connett, executive director of the Fluoride Action Network, raw data from a more recent, 2010 NHANES study points to a conclusion that 64% of today's adolescents suffer from enamel fluorosis, more than 25% having the moderate or severe forms. In view of the CDC's past history of delaying publication of unpleasant findings, we don't expect their official report any time soon.
"Mild" Dental Fluorosis

"Mild" Dental Fluorosis

More "Mild" Dental Fluorosis

 "Moderate" Fluorosis

Moderate Dental Fluorosis

Moderate Dental Fluorosis

P.O. Box 7486  •  Austin, TX 78713

Go to




Check here to add yourself to our email list -->

 744 Visitors